Federalism vs. Anti-Federalism
| Federalism | Anti-Federalism |
| Necessity of union | |
| Republican government can be national (continental), Democracy must be smaller | Best Republican government = local. In a large republic, favoritism is “easily perceived” (unavoidable?). |
| National government would not take power away from state or local governments | Putting power into the hands of a few à abuse of power à monarchy. Republican government over large territory must become stronger to keep order à less power locally |
| Purpose of Constitution is to unify the states (same purpose as Articles of Confederation) | Republican government can never form a perfect union, (etc. – see preamble to Constitution) because faction & abuse of power are unavoidable |
| National government will improve transportation & communication infrastructure – unifying West with East | |
| Outlying states (GA) need union to protect against increased risk of foreign attack | |
| Government needs the power to preserve itself – states would kill congress if they had power over federal elections | If the power to decide on elections is taken away from state governments, will state governments cease to exist? The federalist argument that states would kill congress is an absurd argument – without any foundation; Not abolishing congress is in best interest of state governments |
| Power in central government allows the government flexibility to change with the times. | |
| Abuse of power as likely at state level as at federal level | Senate cannot be impartial – Senate is dependant on the president; Congress would be able to establish a remote location for the election, allowing them to control elections; Argument that congress won’t about power is an absurd argument, without foundation |
| Constitution designed to protect federal government from states – only general public can abolish Senate | |
| | Give leaders of the country the power they need as they need it – don’t give them unlimited power |
| Without a strong central government, | |
| Common defense: army needs to be under central control because | |
| | Against national tax: central government cannot know local needs, so how can they represent us in taxation? |
| | The state will have no power to help anyone who is abused by the national government |
| | National government is not controlled by the purse string |
| Government should “naturally” divide itself into three branches – separations of power | |
| | Bill of Rights |
| | Constitution needs to be reworked |
| Supreme Court should have the power to . . . | No checks on power of Supreme Court à Supreme Court is too powerful |
| | Supreme Court judges should be chosen by the people so the judicial authority is not so independent |
| | Constitution was written in secret without the will of the people |
| | In order to respect persons, most decisions of conscience and dispute should be kept local |
| | Basic individual rights need to be protected |
| Separate states would act like separate countries – bickering, wars between states, etc. | |
| States would sacrifice individual rights to protect themselves (standing armies, etc). | |
| Larger states would override (conquer) smaller states | |
| | |
| If | |
| Centralized army allows for better training and organization | |
| Strong central government can keep the power of the army in check | |
| Being able to threaten use of military force will result in less need to actually use military force | |
| | |

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home