Federalism vs. Anti-Federalism, part 3
| Federalism | Antifederalism | Strong central government would be able to mobilize state militias in the defense of other states | |
| Power to raise army = legislative, not executive. | House of representatives needs more power – cannot make law or impeach the president without senate approval |
| | Because of the way senators are elected, there is always a majority of incumbent senators à aristocracy |
| | Representatives in the House need to be elected annually to keep them from being under too much control of their constituents |
| | Fear of federalist aristocracy forgetting the middle and lower class |
| | Fear of a large army giving central government tyrannical power |
| | Fear that Republic is a smoke screen for aristocracy- fear that HR will be powerless & Senate/Pres will hold unilateral power |
| No state should enter into individual treaties with other countries à avoid feuds, different allegiances could tear US apart (like Europeans during WWI). | |
| No state should impose duties on imports or exports (interstates commerce) à standardized rates will help trade & unity & economy | The federal government should not be allowed to become tyrannical. |
| No state should hold standing armies or navies à keep peace between states (unity) | |
| State legislatures should be bound by oath to support Constitution | |
| | Adoption of Constitution will lead to civil war because it establishes aristocracy |
| | Congress has power to regulate their own jobs/salaries/etc., and is therefore too independent of the people |
| | Change of government is always destabilizing, and especially when recovering from war |
| Separate regulations for states will cause conflict & competition between countries, causing international and domestic unrest | |
| All states will benefit together from a united trading policy | States have local advantages and separate interests. Monopolies need to be avoided. |
| Navy needed to protect our trades from other countries | |
| Separate states would be weak victims of foreign attack | |
| Navy is able to enforce rights of neutrality | |
| Individual states will benefit from a universal navy – building the navy = commerce | |
| All states will participate in the navy | Who will have control over the navy? Congress should have control, but be limited (all states should agree on specifics of this power) |
| Separation of powers, checks & balances | |
| Strong central leadership is vital to the preservation of the union | The Constitution Convention was supposed to revise the Articles of Confederation |
| | Constitution gives up natural rights |
| | Strong central government will lead to tyranny |
| | Supreme Court: would take away powers from the local courts that would be necessary for order & security |
| The Constitution gives to the national government many of the same powers that the Articles of Confederation gave to it. | |
| Supreme Court should be bound to the central government – otherwise the states will always override the authority of the Supreme Court | |
| Elected representatives are bound by oath to the Constitution à Rule of Law | Where is the restraint in the power of the congress when the Constitution gives them extensive & unnecessary powers? How can the Rule of Law be enforced without the use of force? |
| | “Necessary and Proper” clause is too loose – how can it be defined? Giving the Congress so much power makes the Bill of Rights useless. |
