Advanced Placement United States History
Sunday, April 08, 2007
Tuesday, May 02, 2006
Federalism vs. Anti-Federalism, part 3
| Federalism | Antifederalism | Strong central government would be able to mobilize state militias in the defense of other states | |
| Power to raise army = legislative, not executive. | House of representatives needs more power – cannot make law or impeach the president without senate approval |
| | Because of the way senators are elected, there is always a majority of incumbent senators à aristocracy |
| | Representatives in the House need to be elected annually to keep them from being under too much control of their constituents |
| | Fear of federalist aristocracy forgetting the middle and lower class |
| | Fear of a large army giving central government tyrannical power |
| | Fear that Republic is a smoke screen for aristocracy- fear that HR will be powerless & Senate/Pres will hold unilateral power |
| No state should enter into individual treaties with other countries à avoid feuds, different allegiances could tear US apart (like Europeans during WWI). | |
| No state should impose duties on imports or exports (interstates commerce) à standardized rates will help trade & unity & economy | The federal government should not be allowed to become tyrannical. |
| No state should hold standing armies or navies à keep peace between states (unity) | |
| State legislatures should be bound by oath to support Constitution | |
| | Adoption of Constitution will lead to civil war because it establishes aristocracy |
| | Congress has power to regulate their own jobs/salaries/etc., and is therefore too independent of the people |
| | Change of government is always destabilizing, and especially when recovering from war |
| Separate regulations for states will cause conflict & competition between countries, causing international and domestic unrest | |
| All states will benefit together from a united trading policy | States have local advantages and separate interests. Monopolies need to be avoided. |
| Navy needed to protect our trades from other countries | |
| Separate states would be weak victims of foreign attack | |
| Navy is able to enforce rights of neutrality | |
| Individual states will benefit from a universal navy – building the navy = commerce | |
| All states will participate in the navy | Who will have control over the navy? Congress should have control, but be limited (all states should agree on specifics of this power) |
| Separation of powers, checks & balances | |
| Strong central leadership is vital to the preservation of the union | The Constitution Convention was supposed to revise the Articles of Confederation |
| | Constitution gives up natural rights |
| | Strong central government will lead to tyranny |
| | Supreme Court: would take away powers from the local courts that would be necessary for order & security |
| The Constitution gives to the national government many of the same powers that the Articles of Confederation gave to it. | |
| Supreme Court should be bound to the central government – otherwise the states will always override the authority of the Supreme Court | |
| Elected representatives are bound by oath to the Constitution à Rule of Law | Where is the restraint in the power of the congress when the Constitution gives them extensive & unnecessary powers? How can the Rule of Law be enforced without the use of force? |
| | “Necessary and Proper” clause is too loose – how can it be defined? Giving the Congress so much power makes the Bill of Rights useless. |
Thursday, April 20, 2006
Federalism vs. Anti-Federalism, part 2
| Federalists | Antifederalists |
| Supreme Court should have the power to . . . | No checks on power of Supreme Court à Supreme Court is too powerful |
| | Supreme Court judges should be chosen by the people so the judicial authority is not so independent |
| | Constitution was written in secret without the will of the people |
| | In order to respect persons, most decisions of conscience and dispute should be kept local |
| | Basic individual rights need to be protected |
| Separate states would act like separate countries – bickering, wars between states, etc. | |
| States would sacrifice individual rights to protect themselves (standing armies, etc). | |
| Larger states would override (conquer) smaller states | |
| | |
| If | |
| Centralized army allows for better training and organization | |
| Strong central government can keep the power of the army in check | |
| Being able to threaten use of military force will result in less need to actually use military force | |
| Strong central government would be able to mobilize state militias in the defense of other states | |
| Power to raise army = legislative, not executive. | House of representatives needs more power – cannot make law or impeach the president without senate approval |
| | Because of the way senators are elected, there is always a majority of incumbent senators à aristocracy |
| | Representatives in the House need to be elected annually to keep them from being under too much control of their constituents |
| | Fear of federalist aristocracy forgetting the middle and lower class |
| | Fear of a large army giving central government tyrannical power |
| | Fear that Republic is a smoke screen for aristocracy- fear that HR will be powerless & Senate/Pres will hold unilateral power |
| No state should enter into individual treaties with other countries à avoid feuds, different allegiances could tear US apart (like Europeans during WWI). | |
| No state should impose duties on imports or exports (interstates commerce) à standardized rates will help trade & unity & economy | The federal government should not be allowed to become tyrannical. |
| No state should hold standing armies or navies à keep peace between states (unity) | |
| State legislatures should be bound by oath to support Constitution | |
| | Adoption of Constitution will lead to civil war because it establishes aristocracy |
| | Congress has power to regulate their own jobs/salaries/etc., and is therefore too independent of the people |
| | Change of government is always destabilizing, and especially when recovering from war |
| Separate regulations for states will cause conflict & competition between countries, causing international and domestic unrest | |
| All states will benefit together from a united trading policy | States have local advantages and separate interests. Monopolies need to be avoided. |
| Navy needed to protect our trades from other countries | |
| Separate states would be weak victims of foreign attack | |
| Navy is able to enforce rights of neutrality | |
| Individual states will benefit from a universal navy – building the navy = commerce | |
| All states will participate in the navy | Who will have control over the navy? Congress should have control, but be limited (all states should agree on specifics of this power) |
| Separation of powers, checks & balances | |
| Strong central leadership is vital to the preservation of the union | The Constitution Convention was supposed to revise the Articles of Confederation |
| | Constitution gives up natural rights |
| | Strong central government will lead to tyranny |
| | Supreme Court: would take away powers from the local courts that would be necessary for order & security |
| The Constitution gives to the national government many of the same powers that the Articles of Confederation gave to it. | |
| Supreme Court should be bound to the central government – otherwise the states will always override the authority of the Supreme Court | |
| Elected representatives are bound by oath to the Constitution à Rule of Law | Where is the restraint in the power of the congress when the Constitution gives them extensive & unnecessary powers? How can the Rule of Law be enforced without the use of force? |
| | “Necessary and Proper” clause is too loose – how can it be defined? Giving the Congress so much power makes the Bill of Rights useless. |
Wednesday, April 12, 2006
Federalism vs. Anti-Federalism
| Federalism | Anti-Federalism |
| Necessity of union | |
| Republican government can be national (continental), Democracy must be smaller | Best Republican government = local. In a large republic, favoritism is “easily perceived” (unavoidable?). |
| National government would not take power away from state or local governments | Putting power into the hands of a few à abuse of power à monarchy. Republican government over large territory must become stronger to keep order à less power locally |
| Purpose of Constitution is to unify the states (same purpose as Articles of Confederation) | Republican government can never form a perfect union, (etc. – see preamble to Constitution) because faction & abuse of power are unavoidable |
| National government will improve transportation & communication infrastructure – unifying West with East | |
| Outlying states (GA) need union to protect against increased risk of foreign attack | |
| Government needs the power to preserve itself – states would kill congress if they had power over federal elections | If the power to decide on elections is taken away from state governments, will state governments cease to exist? The federalist argument that states would kill congress is an absurd argument – without any foundation; Not abolishing congress is in best interest of state governments |
| Power in central government allows the government flexibility to change with the times. | |
| Abuse of power as likely at state level as at federal level | Senate cannot be impartial – Senate is dependant on the president; Congress would be able to establish a remote location for the election, allowing them to control elections; Argument that congress won’t about power is an absurd argument, without foundation |
| Constitution designed to protect federal government from states – only general public can abolish Senate | |
| | Give leaders of the country the power they need as they need it – don’t give them unlimited power |
| Without a strong central government, | |
| Common defense: army needs to be under central control because | |
| | Against national tax: central government cannot know local needs, so how can they represent us in taxation? |
| | The state will have no power to help anyone who is abused by the national government |
| | National government is not controlled by the purse string |
| Government should “naturally” divide itself into three branches – separations of power | |
| | Bill of Rights |
| | Constitution needs to be reworked |
| Supreme Court should have the power to . . . | No checks on power of Supreme Court à Supreme Court is too powerful |
| | Supreme Court judges should be chosen by the people so the judicial authority is not so independent |
| | Constitution was written in secret without the will of the people |
| | In order to respect persons, most decisions of conscience and dispute should be kept local |
| | Basic individual rights need to be protected |
| Separate states would act like separate countries – bickering, wars between states, etc. | |
| States would sacrifice individual rights to protect themselves (standing armies, etc). | |
| Larger states would override (conquer) smaller states | |
| | |
| If | |
| Centralized army allows for better training and organization | |
| Strong central government can keep the power of the army in check | |
| Being able to threaten use of military force will result in less need to actually use military force | |
| | |
Thursday, April 06, 2006
Post-Revolutionary Crises: Themes & Questions
Post-Revolutionary Crises: Themes & Questions
Unity vs. Plurality
· Following Revolution,
· Saw selves as independent nation-states (countries).
· Distrusted, and even disliked each other.
Localism vs. Nationalism
· Primary loyalty and frame of reference was the local territory, not even the state.
· Reputation
· Control of government = locality
· Separation of Powers
· Slowly growing sense of “nationalism.”
o Is
o Common language: Noah Webster: dictionary 1780
o Territory: common borders or boundaries <> Localism, no large cities (compared to
o Common traditions and institutions: Religion, Fourth of July: 1830-50’s
o Currency: specie & local paper credits (reputation)
· Myth of American National Character
o Myth = narrative formulation of a culture’s worldview.
o Letters of an American Farmer by Hector Saint John Crevecoeur:
o Equality, uniformity
o Melting pot
o Self-made man
o Ideal vs. Reality
· How much liberty is good for society?
· Too much liberty = anarchy
· Too much order = tyranny
Democracy vs. Republicanism
· Democracy = Competition of self-interests
· Republicanism = Self-discipline & self-denial
· Sacrifice of self-interest for the sake of the government
· Republic Virtue
o Thomas Paine: the common good of the public
o Monarchy, Aristocracy & Democracy checked and balanced
o Virtuous people adopt balance of government
o Public Square
o Education, penitentiaries
o
o Avoid debt & dependency – leads to desperation & vice
o Republican Motherhood: equality, reciprocal union of interests, women = liberty
History vs. New Order
· American exceptionalism
· Is
· Can anyone be completely free from history?
American Character: What characterizes the American?
· Individualism? Rugged Individualism?
· Frontier?
· Geographic mobility?
· Social mobility?
· Uniqueness?
· Youth? (median age in the teens)
· Agricultural?
· Ideal vs. Reality
