Sunday, April 08, 2007

United States History Reading List

Did someone else discover Magellan's strait?

Tuesday, May 02, 2006

Federalism vs. Anti-Federalism, part 3

Federalism

Antifederalism

Strong central government would be able to mobilize state militias in the defense of other states

Power to raise army = legislative, not executive.

House of representatives needs more power – cannot make law or impeach the president without senate approval

Because of the way senators are elected, there is always a majority of incumbent senators à aristocracy

Representatives in the House need to be elected annually to keep them from being under too much control of their constituents

Fear of federalist aristocracy forgetting the middle and lower class

Fear of a large army giving central government tyrannical power

Fear that Republic is a smoke screen for aristocracy- fear that HR will be powerless & Senate/Pres will hold unilateral power

No state should enter into individual treaties with other countries à avoid feuds, different allegiances could tear US apart (like Europeans during WWI).

No state should impose duties on imports or exports (interstates commerce) à standardized rates will help trade & unity & economy

The federal government should not be allowed to become tyrannical.

No state should hold standing armies or navies à keep peace between states (unity)

State legislatures should be bound by oath to support Constitution

Adoption of Constitution will lead to civil war because it establishes aristocracy

Congress has power to regulate their own jobs/salaries/etc., and is therefore too independent of the people

Change of government is always destabilizing, and especially when recovering from war

Separate regulations for states will cause conflict & competition between countries, causing international and domestic unrest

All states will benefit together from a united trading policy

States have local advantages and separate interests.

Monopolies need to be avoided.

Navy needed to protect our trades from other countries

Separate states would be weak victims of foreign attack

Navy is able to enforce rights of neutrality

Individual states will benefit from a universal navy – building the navy = commerce

All states will participate in the navy

Who will have control over the navy? Congress should have control, but be limited (all states should agree on specifics of this power)

Separation of powers, checks & balances

Strong central leadership is vital to the preservation of the union

The Constitution Convention was supposed to revise the Articles of Confederation

Constitution gives up natural rights

Strong central government will lead to tyranny

Supreme Court: would take away powers from the local courts that would be necessary for order & security

The Constitution gives to the national government many of the same powers that the Articles of Confederation gave to it.

Supreme Court should be bound to the central government – otherwise the states will always override the authority of the Supreme Court

Elected representatives are bound by oath to the Constitution à Rule of Law

Where is the restraint in the power of the congress when the Constitution gives them extensive & unnecessary powers? How can the Rule of Law be enforced without the use of force?

“Necessary and Proper” clause is too loose – how can it be defined? Giving the Congress so much power makes the Bill of Rights useless.

Thursday, April 20, 2006

Federalism vs. Anti-Federalism, part 2

Federalists

Antifederalists

Supreme Court should have the power to . . .

No checks on power of Supreme Court à Supreme Court is too powerful

Supreme Court judges should be chosen by the people so the judicial authority is not so independent

Constitution was written in secret without the will of the people

In order to respect persons, most decisions of conscience and dispute should be kept local

Basic individual rights need to be protected

Separate states would act like separate countries – bickering, wars between states, etc.

States would sacrifice individual rights to protect themselves (standing armies, etc).

Larger states would override (conquer) smaller states

America needs a national standing army to keep peace

If America can keep the peace, we will remain at peace because we lack aggressors surrounding us – a large standing is not necessary

Centralized army allows for better training and organization

Strong central government can keep the power of the army in check

Being able to threaten use of military force will result in less need to actually use military force

Strong central government would be able to mobilize state militias in the defense of other states

Power to raise army = legislative, not executive.

House of representatives needs more power – cannot make law or impeach the president without senate approval

Because of the way senators are elected, there is always a majority of incumbent senators à aristocracy

Representatives in the House need to be elected annually to keep them from being under too much control of their constituents

Fear of federalist aristocracy forgetting the middle and lower class

Fear of a large army giving central government tyrannical power

Fear that Republic is a smoke screen for aristocracy- fear that HR will be powerless & Senate/Pres will hold unilateral power

No state should enter into individual treaties with other countries à avoid feuds, different allegiances could tear US apart (like Europeans during WWI).

No state should impose duties on imports or exports (interstates commerce) à standardized rates will help trade & unity & economy

The federal government should not be allowed to become tyrannical.

No state should hold standing armies or navies à keep peace between states (unity)

State legislatures should be bound by oath to support Constitution

Adoption of Constitution will lead to civil war because it establishes aristocracy

Congress has power to regulate their own jobs/salaries/etc., and is therefore too independent of the people

Change of government is always destabilizing, and especially when recovering from war

Separate regulations for states will cause conflict & competition between countries, causing international and domestic unrest

All states will benefit together from a united trading policy

States have local advantages and separate interests.

Monopolies need to be avoided.

Navy needed to protect our trades from other countries

Separate states would be weak victims of foreign attack

Navy is able to enforce rights of neutrality

Individual states will benefit from a universal navy – building the navy = commerce

All states will participate in the navy

Who will have control over the navy? Congress should have control, but be limited (all states should agree on specifics of this power)

Separation of powers, checks & balances

Strong central leadership is vital to the preservation of the union

The Constitution Convention was supposed to revise the Articles of Confederation

Constitution gives up natural rights

Strong central government will lead to tyranny

Supreme Court: would take away powers from the local courts that would be necessary for order & security

The Constitution gives to the national government many of the same powers that the Articles of Confederation gave to it.

Supreme Court should be bound to the central government – otherwise the states will always override the authority of the Supreme Court

Elected representatives are bound by oath to the Constitution à Rule of Law

Where is the restraint in the power of the congress when the Constitution gives them extensive & unnecessary powers? How can the Rule of Law be enforced without the use of force?

“Necessary and Proper” clause is too loose – how can it be defined? Giving the Congress so much power makes the Bill of Rights useless.

Wednesday, April 12, 2006

Federalism vs. Anti-Federalism

Federalism

Anti-Federalism

Necessity of union


Republican government can be national (continental), Democracy must be smaller

Best Republican government = local. In a large republic, favoritism is “easily perceived” (unavoidable?).

National government would not take power away from state or local governments

Putting power into the hands of a few à abuse of power à monarchy. Republican government over large territory must become stronger to keep order à less power locally

Purpose of Constitution is to unify the states (same purpose as Articles of Confederation)

Republican government can never form a perfect union, (etc. – see preamble to Constitution) because faction & abuse of power are unavoidable

National government will improve transportation & communication infrastructure – unifying West with East


Outlying states (GA) need union to protect against increased risk of foreign attack


Government needs the power to preserve itself – states would kill congress if they had power over federal elections

If the power to decide on elections is taken away from state governments, will state governments cease to exist? The federalist argument that states would kill congress is an absurd argument – without any foundation; Not abolishing congress is in best interest of state governments

Power in central government allows the government flexibility to change with the times.


Abuse of power as likely at state level as at federal level

Senate cannot be impartial – Senate is dependant on the president; Congress would be able to establish a remote location for the election, allowing them to control elections; Argument that congress won’t about power is an absurd argument, without foundation

Constitution designed to protect federal government from states – only general public can abolish Senate



Give leaders of the country the power they need as they need it – don’t give them unlimited power

Without a strong central government, America faces the death of the confederacy


Common defense: army needs to be under central control because America needs the ability to respond strongly to internal and external threats - power should not be limited (for the good of the nation)



Against national tax: central government cannot know local needs, so how can they represent us in taxation?


The state will have no power to help anyone who is abused by the national government


National government is not controlled by the purse string

Government should “naturally” divide itself into three branches – separations of power



Bill of Rights


Constitution needs to be reworked

Supreme Court should have the power to . . .

No checks on power of Supreme Court à Supreme Court is too powerful


Supreme Court judges should be chosen by the people so the judicial authority is not so independent


Constitution was written in secret without the will of the people


In order to respect persons, most decisions of conscience and dispute should be kept local


Basic individual rights need to be protected

Separate states would act like separate countries – bickering, wars between states, etc.


States would sacrifice individual rights to protect themselves (standing armies, etc).


Larger states would override (conquer) smaller states


America needs a national standing army to keep peace


If America can keep the peace, we will remain at peace because we lack aggressors surrounding us – a large standing is not necessary


Centralized army allows for better training and organization


Strong central government can keep the power of the army in check


Being able to threaten use of military force will result in less need to actually use military force




Thursday, April 06, 2006

Post-Revolutionary Crises: Themes & Questions

Post-Revolutionary Crises: Themes & Questions

Unity vs. Plurality

· Following Revolution, United States is plural

· Saw selves as independent nation-states (countries).

· Distrusted, and even disliked each other.

Localism vs. Nationalism

· Primary loyalty and frame of reference was the local territory, not even the state.

· Reputation

· Control of government = locality

· Separation of Powers

· Slowly growing sense of “nationalism.”

o Is America a Nation?

o Common language: Noah Webster: dictionary 1780

o Territory: common borders or boundaries <> Localism, no large cities (compared to Europe)

o Common traditions and institutions: Religion, Fourth of July: 1830-50’s

o Currency: specie & local paper credits (reputation)

· Myth of American National Character

o Myth = narrative formulation of a culture’s worldview.

o Letters of an American Farmer by Hector Saint John Crevecoeur:

o Equality, uniformity

o Melting pot

o Self-made man

o Ideal vs. Reality

Liberty vs. Order

· How much liberty is good for society?

· Too much liberty = anarchy

· Too much order = tyranny

Democracy vs. Republicanism

· Democracy = Competition of self-interests

· Republicanism = Self-discipline & self-denial

· Sacrifice of self-interest for the sake of the government

· Republic Virtue

o Thomas Paine: the common good of the public

o Monarchy, Aristocracy & Democracy checked and balanced

o Virtuous people adopt balance of government

o Public Square

o Education, penitentiaries

o Franklin

o Avoid debt & dependency – leads to desperation & vice

o Republican Motherhood: equality, reciprocal union of interests, women = liberty

History vs. New Order

· American exceptionalism

· Is America tied to normal forces of history?

· Can anyone be completely free from history?

American Character: What characterizes the American?

· Individualism? Rugged Individualism?

· Frontier?

· Geographic mobility?

· Social mobility?

· Uniqueness?

· Youth? (median age in the teens)

· Agricultural?

· Ideal vs. Reality

Monday, March 20, 2006

Articles of Confederation



Tuesday, March 14, 2006

New Kind of Revolution Discussion

“Real Whigs” vs. Tories
Rule of Law
Codified Law / Written Constitution
Separation of Powers
Your Ideas from the article